The government lied to us about wiretapping, Katrina, Iraq and WMDs--should we trust them on 9/11?
Among the evidence that casts doubt on the official story:
-Fire has never -before or after 9/11- caused a steel frame building to collapse. Controlled demolition is the only explanation for the sudden, explosive, complete collapse of the World Trade Towers at near free-fall speed into their own footprints.
-Not two, but three World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11. The other building, World Trade Center Building 7, collapsed in a manner consistent with only controlled demolition. Furthermore, the World Trade Center's leaseholder, Larry Silverstein, said on PBS in 2002 that he suggested to the NYC fire department commander that they "pull" the building, which is a demolition industry term that means to demolish.
-The steel from the World Trade Towers, which could have revealed that the buildings were brought down by explosives, quickly was shipped to China without inspection, in violation of federal crime scene laws.
-According to the respected British news sources, the BBC and The Guardian, some of the alleged 9/11 'suicide' hijackers are still alive.
Don't just trust a government that admits itself it's in the habit of lying to citizens. Come to the Boston 9/11 Truth Film Marathon and decide for yourself.
February 9-11, 2007
An evidence-based, scientifically-sound look into what really happened on 9/11.
26 hours of spellbinding documentaries about 9/11 and related topics.
boston-sons-of-liberty@googlegroups.com
Friday, Feb 9, 6pm-midnight
Saturday, Feb 10, noon-midnight
Sunday, Feb 11, noon-8pm
Location:
The Democracy Center
45 Mt. Auburn Street
Harvard Square
Contact/Information:
Andrea 339-203-2895
3 comments:
cool, i guess. but showing these movies isnt going to change anything. if we really want to eliminate the state (to eg, eliminate the possibility that an upper tier within the government could allow things like 9/11 to go on and/or provide logistical support/planning, eliminate the war on drugs so that those who were above the law are going to have to content with a much lower-margin environment, allow true open-market alternatives to social services, etc.), i see 2 options. one to wait for it to crumble under its own hubris (then why has this not happened already?), or to convince everyone not to stop paying taxes and question the legitimacy of the state, which of course seems like a bit of a pipe dream.
i think one viable approach would be to create an alternative currency, backed by a basket of local bonds and community shares and non-fiat currencies, commodities, etc. if people can conduct their daily business and the goldmancitibankfedreserve empire can't step in and stop the transactions of those who arent paying taxes, we're in good shape. if we thought web spam was bad, imagine people trying to game a p2p distributed currency system though - we're going to need a lot of stanford grads etc. good luck in your endeavours..
not that i mean to belittle what you're doing. but i do think they think its cute that the few freaks out there are in their cute little zine library causing no ruckus...
All of the so-called scientific evidence presented in this movie ( s) has been de-bunked. Refer to Sceptic Magazine Dec '06 cover article.
Post a Comment